HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Howard, L. Articles by Wessely, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Howard, L. Articles by Wessely, S.

Do Investigations Reassure Patients with No Organic Pathology?

^* Health Services Research Department and
Department of Psychological Medicine, PO 29, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF; E-mail: *spjelmh{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk and sphascw{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

EXTRACT

INTRODUCTION

Many patients present to neurology outpatient clinics without serious pathology–the classic example is the patient with chronic headache who believes he has a brain tumour. After a history and examination the neurologist is confident of the diagnosis of chronic tension-type headache, but is left not knowing whether to send the patient for a brain scan ‘for reassurance’. Do investigations reassure patients, or do they make them suspect that the doctor is uncertain of the diagnosis, so leading to increased anxiety about an underlying disease?

THE EVIDENCE BASE

The literature is conflicting (Howard & Wessely 1996). It is difficult to measure reassurance (there are no specific tests for it!). Asking the patient whether he or she feels reassured is problematic because most patients want to please their doctors. In addition to asking specific questions about the patient’s feelings of reassurance, researchers have therefore resorted to measuring reassurance by using ...

[PDF of this article]