HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brown, M. M Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Brown, M. M

Should carotid stenting replace carotid endarterectomy in routine clinical practice?

Professor of Stroke Medicine, UCL Institute of Neurology, Box 6, The National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; m.brown{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

Carotid stenting has the advantage over endarterectomy of avoiding the complications of neck incision, and often of general anaesthesia too, but it has not yet been shown convincingly to be either as safe or as effective. Only randomised controlled trials allow proper comparison of these aspects of stenting and endarterectomy, but the results to date have been contradictory. Some trials have shown similar 30-day risks of stroke or death, while others have been stopped early because of significantly worse outcome in the stenting group. Inclusion of investigators with limited experience of carotid stenting devices may have contributed to poor results in some trials. The published trials are rather heterogeneous, none is large enough to provide convincing data, and there is very limited long-term follow-up information. We therefore need more data from the ongoing randomised trials before recommending that stenting should in general replace endarterectomy for either symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis. ...[End of Extract]

[PDF of this article]