|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Letters to the editor |
1 Consultant Neurologist, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
2 Consultant Neurologist, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J Stone, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; Jon.Stone@ed.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
We enjoyed Fuller and Lindahls article about clinical clues for distinguishing epilepsy from non-epileptic attacks.1 Their comments about the location of tongue biting in non-epileptic attacks (rarely the side, sometimes the tip) may well be correct, but we thought they deserved some additional comment, partly because their analysis omitted a number of relevant studies (see table).212 We have combined the mainly small series in the table, admittedly inviting a host of methodological problems. What this literature shows though is that when non-specific "tongue biting" is recorded it isnt a useful discriminator. Only the Benbadis study6 looked at whether the tip or the side of the tongue was bittensomething that this single study suggests is a highly specific discriminator. In addition, the data may mask differences between the patients who give a history of tongue biting and the patient who shows you a bitten tongue.
So, on
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |