Practical Neurology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Practical Neurology 2006;6:206-207; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.097667
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spinner, R. J
Right arrow Articles by Windebank, A. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Spinner, R. J
Right arrow Articles by Windebank, A. J

Editorial

Breaking down the silos: the team approach to evaluating the patient referred for neurological surgery

Robert J Spinner1, Anthony J Windebank2

1 Consultant in Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Associate Professor of Anatomy, Neurosurgery and Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
2 Consultant in Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Professor of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor A J Windebank, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 1st, Street SW, Rochester, MN 55901, USA;
windebank.anthony@mayo.edu

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The visit for a patient referred for evaluation by specialists tends to be organised around the convenience of the doctors rather than centred on the needs of the patient. We justify this in terms of efficient use of resources, although this may not always be the case. In an ideal world, all the diagnostic and evaluative resources would be made available to the patients in an integrated way that would enable them to join with their doctors in making an informed decision about treatment. In our own fields of neurology and neurosurgery the patient is generally referred for the individual opinion of the neurologist or neurosurgeon, rather than the evaluation process being centred on the patient. However, we believe that medical care can be improved when patients with problems that may require neurosurgery are evaluated by the neurologist and neurosurgeon—together.

At a few institutions this team approach has been developed . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med BiogrHome page
D. Todman
Henry Woltman (1889-1964): pioneering American neurologist
J Med Biogr, August 1, 2008; 16(3): 162 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.