|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Letters to the editor |
1 Department of Neurology, Essex Centre for Neurological Sciences, Queens Hospital, Romford, Essex RM7 0AG, UK
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In Richard Davenports description of an individual with ataxia harbouring an FMR1 gene permutation in the October issue of Practical Neurology,1 the patients detailed family history is not explored. This may occasionally provide a clue to the diagnosis. I am seeing a late middle-aged patient with a seven year history of tremor and ataxia, whose diagnosis emerged when her daughters son was diagnosed with fragile X syndrome. (In a case report entitled Genetics in reverse, Chinnery et al described a similar scenario.2) In Davenports case, one presumes that the diagnosis was achieved by applying the newly described test on a repository of undiagnosed patients DNA samples. Indeed he recommends retaining (DNA) samples on patients for future "diagnostic" use. The level of consent required for retaining and testing such specimens is not specified. As exemplified by FMR1 premutation cases, the implications on future generations may be huge, and
Richard J Davenport2
2 Consultant Neurologist, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XY, UK; rjd@skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R J Davenport Why can't I make neurological diagnoses anymore? Practical Neurology, April 1, 2008; 8(2): 74 - 76. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |