Practical Neurology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Practical Neurology 2007;7:204-205; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.120535a
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Test yourself

Answers

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

1. Probable neurilemoma of the common peroneal nerve
Peripheral nerve sheath tumours (PNST) are divided into neurilemomas (schwanomas) and neurofibromas. Clinical and radiological differentiation of these tumours is difficult. Both types tend to be solitary, of fusiform shape and have a true capsule. Major nerves are splayed as they envelope the mass (see superior and inferior aspects of the MR images), whereas small nerves are usually destroyed by the tumour. Unlike neurilemomas, where both tumour and nerve may be identified within the capsule, the epineurium, neurofibromas are intimately intermixed, inseparable from normal nerve tissue. The histological hallmarks of neurilemoma are both cellular Antoni A and myxoid Antoni B regions, within the capsule, whereas a neurofibroma is composed of interlacing fascicles of wavy elongated cells that often contain abundant amounts of collagen.

Only a small percentage of all peripheral nerve sheath tumours are associated with neurofibromatosis (NF1); no other signs of this disorder were found in this case. Two . . . [Full text of this article]


Related Articles

How good at neurology are you?
Practical Neurology 2007 7: 202-203. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

How good at neurology are you? — QUESTIONS
Practical Neurology 2006 6: 126-127. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.