Practical Neurology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Practical Neurology 2007;7:282-284; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.129007
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blackburn, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pengiran Tengah, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blackburn, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pengiran Tengah, D. S.

Editorial

Why bother with research when training to be a neurologist?

Daniel Blackburn, Research Fellow1, Dayangku Siti Pengiran Tengah, Locum Consultant Neurologist2

1 Academic Neurology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
2 Department of Neurology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D Blackburn
Academic Neurology Unit, E-Floor Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK; d.blackburn@shef.ac.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


Figure 1

Doctor or scientist? Many if not most neurologists, at least in the UK, do some research, publish a few papers and obtain a postgraduate degree such as a PhD. The academic neurologist, usually working in a University Hospital, can clearly make a vital contribution to the advancement of clinical and basic sciences. But should non-academic neurologists, working in non-teaching hospitals or outpatient settings, also do some research—at least during their neurology training? Does a period of research make you a better clinical neurologist, and, if so, how and when should this research be incorporated into training? Research during training is time-consuming, liable to failure, costly, and potentially a waste of time if academia is not the intention. Now that UK doctors are undergoing a major shake-up of their postgraduate training (Modernising Medical Careers (MMC)),1 it is important that we ask for evidence to support a period of research for trainees . . . [Full text of this article]




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Career driven and clinically relevant research
Andre J des Etages
Practical Neurology Online, 11 Oct 2007 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.