Share
Other content recommended for you
- Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
- Face-to-face panel meetings versus remote evaluation of fellowship applications: simulation study at the Swiss National Science Foundation
- Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel
- Undisclosed financial conflicts of interest in DSM-5-TR: cross sectional analysis
- Top research priorities in liver and gallbladder disorders in the UK
- Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional study
- On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers
- Protocol for establishing and evaluating a public and patient panel for organisation science and management principles in healthcare
- Selecting an e-cigarette for use in smoking cessation interventions and healthcare services: findings from patient and public consultation for the COSTED trial
- Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports