Article Text
PDFNeuromythology
‘Organic’ and ‘non-organic’: a tale of two turnips
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests We used the phrase ‘organic disease’ in a lot of our epidemiological studies – we shouldn’t have.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Reviewed by Martin Turner, Oxford, UK.
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. The Competing interests statement has been edited.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Complex regional pain syndrome and functional neurological disorders – time for reconciliation
- Functional cognitive disorder: what is it and what to do about it?
- Functional neurological disorder is a feminist issue
- Long-term outcomes of functional neurological disorder in children
- Functional neurological disorders: the neurological assessment as treatment
- Are functional motor and sensory symptoms really more frequent on the left? A systematic review
- Recognising and explaining functional neurological disorder
- Comparing brain structural MRI and metabolic FDG-PET changes in patients with ALS-FTD: ‘the chicken or the egg?’ question
- Prevalence of restless legs syndrome in functional movement disorders: a case–control study from the Czech Republic
- The value of ‘positive’ clinical signs for weakness, sensory and gait disorders in conversion disorder: a systematic and narrative review