Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Second opinions are important in neurology. We provide them all the time, mainly through ward consultations but also as outpatient referrals from non-neurological colleagues. And we also frequently seek opinions from neurological colleagues with subspecialty interests. Sometimes a second opinion is aimed at a specific intervention or evaluation—for example, assessment for epilepsy surgery. Perhaps more often it is because we are at a loss: one of our colleagues has a rule to refer if he still does not know what is going on having seen the patient three times, appreciating the benefit of a fresh pair of eyes. But occasionally it is proactive self-defence. A surgical colleague sensing patient frustration or potential complaint advises, “I know just what you need: you need a second opinion.” Getting in first before the patient summons the courage to ask for it promises a happier outcome. …
Other content recommended for you
- Second opinion programmes in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol
- Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies
- Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
- Second opinion and time to knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study of 142 patients
- Second opinion utilization by healthcare insurance type in a mixed private-public healthcare system: a population-based study
- Patient-initiated second medical consultations—patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review
- Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study
- The differential diagnosis of chorea
- Getting rights right: implementing ‘Martha’s Rule’
- Highlights from this issue