Article info
PDFEditors’ commentary
Highlights from this issue
- Correspondence to Dr Geraint N Fuller, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK; geraint.fuller{at}nhs.net
Citation
Highlights from this issue
Publication history
- Accepted February 5, 2018
- First published March 27, 2018.
Online issue publication
March 28, 2018
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Second opinion programmes in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol
- Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies
- Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
- Second opinion and time to knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study of 142 patients
- Second opinion utilization by healthcare insurance type in a mixed private-public healthcare system: a population-based study
- Patient-initiated second medical consultations—patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review
- Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study
- The differential diagnosis of chorea
- Getting rights right: implementing ‘Martha’s Rule’
- Highlights from this issue