Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Head injury—to scan or not to scan
We already have the New Orleans criteria and the Canadian CT head rule. We now have a Dutch rule to help clinicians decide which patients with minor head injuries should have a CT brain scan, which they say is indicated if one major or two minor criteria are present. This rule can be used in patients who may or may not have lost consciousness and is based on a large prospective study of 3181 adults with minor head injury. The risk factors studied are mostly the usual suspects from the other rules such as age; the Glasgow Coma Scale score; skull fracture; post-traumatic vomiting; amnesia; or seizure. The rule successfully identified patients who had intracranial CT findings of injury (sensitivity, approximately 95%) or needed neurosurgical intervention (sensitivity, 100%) but it has still to be externally validated. None of these rules will work if clinicians miss a risk factor during history taking or examination.
Negligence claims: neurological/neurosurgical cases top of the league
A …
Other content recommended for you
- Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in children: a focused review of incidence and risk factors
- A history of loss of consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia in minor head injury: “conditio sine qua non” or one of the risk factors?
- Checklist for Head Injury Management Evaluation Study (CHIMES): a quality improvement initiative to reduce imaging utilisation for head injuries in the emergency department
- Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP): don’t ask, don’t tell?
- The Canadian CT Head Rule reduced the need for CT scans more than the New Orleans Criteria in minor head injury
- Medicines for migraine
- Weighing the risks of valproate in women who could become pregnant
- Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy
- Southern Regional Meeting Abstracts
- Late presentations of minor head injury