Article info
PDFEditorial
Why bother with research when training to be a neurologist?
- Correspondence to: Dr D Blackburn Academic Neurology Unit, E-Floor Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK; d.blackburn{at}shef.ac.uk
Citation
Why bother with research when training to be a neurologist?
Publication history
- First published September 20, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 14, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Other content recommended for you
- Association of residency work hour reform with long term quality and costs of care of US physicians: observational study
- Adolescent medicine in the USA: a perspective on progress and lessons learnt
- Impact of work schedules of senior resident physicians on patient and resident physician safety: nationwide, prospective cohort study
- Residency schedule, burnout and patient care among first-year residents
- Clinician-educators in emerging graduate medical education systems: description, roles and perceptions
- History and evolution of regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine fellowship training
- Subspecialty training in Europe: a report by the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists
- Impact of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reform on hospital patient experience and processes-of-care
- Development of entrustable professional activities for regional anesthesia and pain medicine fellowship training
- National improvements in resident physician-reported patient safety after limiting first-year resident physicians’ extended duration work shifts: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies