Responses
Editorial
Why bother with research when training to be a neurologist?
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 14 April 2016
- Published on: 14 April 2016Career driven and clinically relevant researchShow More
Dear Editor,
This article highlights an important aspect of scientific training not only to neurologists, but to all clinicians. Advances in neuroimaging,genetic analysis and molecular biology constantly advance our understanding of disease and challenge our approach to treating patients. This demands that even clinically oriented neurologists and neurosurgeons have not only a basic understanding of the process o...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Association of residency work hour reform with long term quality and costs of care of US physicians: observational study
- Adolescent medicine in the USA: a perspective on progress and lessons learnt
- Impact of work schedules of senior resident physicians on patient and resident physician safety: nationwide, prospective cohort study
- Residency schedule, burnout and patient care among first-year residents
- Clinician-educators in emerging graduate medical education systems: description, roles and perceptions
- History and evolution of regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine fellowship training
- Subspecialty training in Europe: a report by the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists
- Impact of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reform on hospital patient experience and processes-of-care
- Development of entrustable professional activities for regional anesthesia and pain medicine fellowship training
- National improvements in resident physician-reported patient safety after limiting first-year resident physicians’ extended duration work shifts: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies