rss
Pract Neurol 2008;8:242-253 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.153619
  • How to understand them

Prognostic models

  1. P M Rothwell
  1. Professor of Clinical Neurology, University Department of Clinical Neurology, Level 6, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK;
    peter.rothwell{at}clneuro.ox.ac.uk

      Abstract

      An appreciation of prognosis is essential for effective clinical practice, in neurology as in other fields. Predicting risk of a poor outcome in individuals, or at least in well-defined groups of individuals, is necessary to properly inform patients about what the future holds for them, and the likely benefits of treatment. Despite the various pitfalls in the derivation and validation of prognostic models (or scores), there are an increasing number of useful models available to help patients and clinicians in routine neurology practice. This article considers how such models are best derived, and how their reliability should be assessed, drawing on examples from various different neurological disorders.

      Register for free content

      The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

      Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs

      Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs