Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

PDF
Making the diagnosis in patients with blackouts: it’s all in the history
  1. L Plug,
  2. M Reuber
  1. 1
    Lecturer in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  2. 2
    Senior Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant in Academic Neurology Unit, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
  1. M Reuber, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; markus.reuber{at}sth.nhs.uk

Abstract

The distinction between the different causes of blackouts is an important and challenging clinical task. Given that treatment is very diagnosis-specific, therapeutic success depends entirely on the correct categorisation of the problem. However, despite impressive technological advances in brain imaging and improved access to tests such as video-EEG monitoring and tilt-table testing, the act of taking and interpreting the patient’s history is still the most important diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients presenting with blackouts; in many if not most cases it provides the only diagnostic pointers. Here we discuss the potential and limitations of using factual information (what patients say about their attacks) and summarise the findings of a number of recent studies which suggest that taking note of how patients talk can help get the diagnosis right.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd