Statistics from Altmetric.com
There are several aspects of Christopher Ward’s editorial in the December issue1 with which one must take issue.
The first is his use of the technical psychiatric term “somatisation”, a word much used by some neurologists, but unfortunately almost always outside its tightly defined DSM IV context.2 Loose usage of a defined concept is never a productive way forward; it simply encourages a pejorative rather than a healing approach. Professor Ward follows this path by accusing neurologists of regarding functional symptoms as unreal. In this context, he uses the term “functional” to embrace symptoms not explained by a recognisable neurological (medical) illness, or considered by a physician as out of …
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.