rss
Pract Neurol 2009;9:284-288 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.181925
  • A difficult case

An error of self-diagnosis—but what was the real diagnosis?

  1. Mamede de Carvalho1,
  2. Michael Swash2
  1. 1
    Consultant, Neurology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
  2. 2
    Consultant, Neuromuscular Unit, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal
  1. Correspondence to Professor M de Carvalho, Neurology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Ave Prof Egas Moniz, Lisbon 1649, Portugal; mamedemg{at}mail.telepac.pt

    Abstract

    The availability of information on the internet encourages people to explore their own diagnosis. Although more knowledge is usually a good thing, self-diagnosis in this way may not always be correct, and it can even adversely influence the medical diagnosis, as in this patient, where the underlying disorder is still uncertain. The patient illustrates the confusion and difficulty in categorising an usual clinical syndrome.

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs

    Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs