Article info
Ethical issues
Brain injury and deprivation of liberty on neurosciences wards: ‘a gilded cage is still a cage’
- Correspondence to Dr Gillian Alice Ashby, Hammersmith and Fulham Liaison Psychiatry, Hammersmith Hospital, 1st Floor B Block, Du Cane Road, London W12 OHS, UK; alice.ashby1{at}nhs.net
Citation
Brain injury and deprivation of liberty on neurosciences wards: ‘a gilded cage is still a cage’
Publication history
- Accepted April 21, 2015
- First published June 2, 2015.
Online issue publication
September 13, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 June 2015).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Palliative care clinicians' knowledge of the law regarding the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)
- Ethics briefing
- Identifying and managing deprivation of liberty in adults in England and Wales
- Reforming DoLS: liberty protection safeguards
- Inquests into patients who die while under a deprivation of liberty order
- Ethics briefing
- Deprivation of liberty safeguards and the Mental Capacity Act
- Ethics briefing
- Deprivation of liberty safeguards: how prepared are we?
- Improving capacity and consent to treatment recording in psychiatric inpatient wards: A multi-centre quality improvement project