Article Text

other Versions

PDF
‘Organic’ and ‘non-organic’: a tale of two turnips
  1. Jon Stone,
  2. Alan Carson
  1. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jon Stone, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; jon.stone{at}ed.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Neurologists use the word ‘organic’ a lot. We like to think we can spot when things are ‘organic’ or indeed ‘non-organic’. But what exactly do we mean?

The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) gives us eight definitions of the word organic. No wonder we get so confused by it. In the biological/medical sense it comes up with ‘Of a part of the body: composed of distinct parts or tissues (obs.); of, relating to, or of the nature of an organ or organs. Later (Med.): producing or characterized by structural or other pathological change in an organ or organs (now esp. the brain) (cf. functional adj. 3b); not psychogenic’.1

The chemical definition boils it right down to basics, ‘relating to or designating compounds which exist naturally as constituents of living …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.