Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Surgical split on carpal tunnel syndrome
A multicentre randomised trial found patient reported functional measures improved whether surgery was performed or not for carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 116). Although surgery gave significantly greater improvement at 6 and 12 months compared with splinting (for 6 weeks minimum), the differences were modest (0.4 on a 1–5 point scale). MR imaging, performed in half of the cases, did not usefully predict the outcome. Carpal tunnel syndrome management remains uncertain. However, initial wrist splinting might seem justified, since 60% of the non-surgical patients were managing without surgery at 12 months.
Dostoyevsky mouse cured of epilepsy
A Fo Ben prefers human research as there aren’t nearly so many mice in clinic as there once were; however, the Myshkin mouse (after the character from The Idiot who, like Dostoyevsky, had epilepsy) has a tale worth telling. It carries a mutation rendering the normally expressed Na+, K+ ATPase a3 isoform (expressed in neurons) inactive, and so develops seizures, preventable by delivering wild-type Na+, K+ ATPase via transgenesis. Human mutations in this pump cause rapid onset dystonia–parkinsonism and—with a2 affected—hemiplegic migraine.
Who cites your work? Previously only the Web of Science gave citation rates; a recent article compared this process with newer tools—Scopus and Google Scholar. Among 328 articles, the new databases each identified more citations than Web of Science. Scopus was better for non-English language citations and reviews; Google Scholar identified fewer papers with declared industry funding and group authored articles. The debate about indices to measure scientific impact is further complicated but please do not cite A Fo Ben on that.
A 48-year-old man with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) was found unconscious holding a nail-gun, a 6 inch nail having traversed his diencephalon to the occipital lobe. His OCD resolved but he developed narcolepsy, with marked hyersomnolence, highly fragmented sleep and short onset REM sleep latency. Although an extreme example, this reminds us that sleep disorders are common and treatable consequences of brain injury.
Family tree pruned
A key paper (cited over 200 times) has been retracted: the journal will not be drawn as to whether the errors were gross carelessness or frank fraud. Forensic re-examination by a geneticist and a neurologist showed exaggeration in two of the three pedigrees. For example, instead of the gene cosegregating in five affected family members (three with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy) in an autosomal dominant manner, in fact only the index case had epilepsy. In the second family, only two of the eight reported as affected had epilepsy: the 16 DNA specimens came from only 10 individuals. Epilepsy genetics was complicated enough already without this added burden.
Syncope at the wheel
Which people who faint should be allowed to continue to drive? A large American study showed an astonishing 10% (n = 3877) of patients with syncope had an attack while driving. Those with syncope while driving were more likely to be male (p < 0.001), younger (p < 0.01) and have a cardiovascular (p < 0.01) or stroke history (p < 0.02) than those who did not have an attack while driving. Thirty-seven per cent of syncope while driving was reflex (vasovagal) and 12% from cardiac arrhythmia. Nineteen per cent of those who fainted while driving had two or more subsequent attacks, half within 6 months of the first; but only 3% of attacks were while driving again. The study was limited by not knowing the licence status of the individuals, their body mass index or the hours driven per year.
Sticking together helps keeps it together
Among 2000 Finnish people, those cohabiting with a partner in mid-life (mean age 50.4 years) showed half the risk (odds ratio 0.48, p = 0.002) of any cognitive impairment later in life compared with non-cohabitants (single, separated or widowed). The highest risk (odds ratio 7.67) was in those widowed before mid-life and still widowed in later life, compared with those living with a partner at both times (p = 0.01). We cannot choose our genes (apolipoprotein E e4 allele carriers were especially vulnerable to Alzheimer’s disease) but we perhaps do think better when sharing our life with another.
If you would have any comments about these items, or any papers that you would like to suggest to A Fo Ben, please email the Editor-in-Chief.