Article Text
Review
Advance planning in end-of-life care: legal and ethical considerations for neurologists
Abstract
Neurological illnesses can leave patients unable to make legally valid decisions about their medical treatment. However, this loss of decision making capacity can often be predicted in advance. The law in the UK now enables patients to make legally binding arrangements to either refuse specific treatments in advance or to appoint others to make decisions on their behalf. This article discusses the mechanics of advance planning under UK law and the role of the neurologist in helping patients to plan ahead.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- An introduction to advance care planning in practice
- Assessing mental capacity: the Mental Capacity Act
- The Mental Capacity Act 2005: a new framework for healthcare decision making
- Ethical issues in nutrition support: a view from the coalface
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Ethics briefing – December 2021
- The weight attributed to patient values in determining best interests
- Procedure, practice and legal requirements: a commentary on ‘Why I wrote my advance decision’
- A new law on advance directives in Germany