Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Brain MRI roulette
  1. Rustam Al-Shahi Salman
  1. Correspondence to Dr R Al-Shahi Salman, MRC Clinician Scientist and Honorary Consultant Neurologist, Bramwell Dott Building, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK;{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

One of the unwritten parts of the job description of a trainee neurologist working in an academic institution can be the requirement to enrol into a brain MRI study as a research volunteer (‘normal control’ sounds too flattering for a neurologist). During my training, thrilled by the respite from requesting esoteric blood tests, I gladly lay on the research MRI scanner table and imagined my protons spinning under the influence of the magnet around me. But had I known that there was a 1 in 37 chance of identifying an incidental finding on brain MRI,1 the magnet would have seemed more like a European roulette wheel in which the ball may land in one of 37 pockets (gamblers, scholars and pedants who read Practical Neurology will know that this comparison breaks down in American roulette where the existence of a 38th double zero pocket offers the player longer odds).

However, before deciding whether to be concerned about the chance, and perhaps the risk, of detecting incidental findings in the brain, it is important to clarify what they may be. In a meta-analysis of their prevalence in the brains of neurologically asymptomatic people, my colleagues and I eventually defined them as ‘apparently asymptomatic intracranial abnormalities that are clinically significant because of their potential to cause symptoms or influence treatment’ (this …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests RASS is prejudiced against commercial screening companies for all the reasons above and because they endlessly post leaflets advertising their services through his letterbox which makes the recycling heavier to carry to the end of his garden.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Other content recommended for you