Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Ten years, 60 issues, approximately 3600 pages, maybe 1.5 million words. My time as editor really is up. The final whistle is blown. It has been a pleasure, fun too, and something of a treadmill but nothing like as exhausting as the treadmill of editing a proper scientific journal—like the JNNP or Brain. It has provided terrific continuing professional development (CPD) for me, and I hope our readers. I must be as up to date in neurology as I have ever been. If push ever comes to shove and I am investigated for insufficient CPD, I will be able to post the 60 issues through the door of the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and tell them I have read every word at least three times, often more (I shall call the several hundred authors as my witnesses). I have never kept a CPD diary for the RCP because I do not have any respect for a bureaucratic system that cannot tell if you are totally engaged at the front of the …
Footnotes
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Doctors’ engagement with a formal system of continuing professional development in Ireland: a qualitative study in perceived benefits, barriers and potential improvements
- Chemical pathology at the Royal College of Pathologists: heading for extinction?
- Revalidation for gastroenterologists, with or without sedation!
- Associate specialists are included in colleges' scheme for continuing medical education
- Fifth report on the provision of services for patients with heart disease
- Continuing professional development for doctors in accident and emergency
- Continuing medical education: Recertification and the maintenance of competence
- Assessing and enhancing quality through outcomes-based continuing professional development (CPD): a review of current practice
- Non-consultant career grade doctors: the dependable backbone of genitourinary medicine?
- Continuing medical education and continuing professional development: international comparisons