Article Text
Abstract
Separating Parkinson's disease from the various causes of atypical parkinsonism (AP) is a common and clinically relevant challenge in clinical practice. Distinguishing between the different causes of AP is even more difficult. Here the authors discuss a systematic, clinically based and three-pronged approach that can assist clinicians in establishing the correct diagnosis in the consulting room. The three consecutive steps include: (1) to verify that the clinical syndrome truly represents parkinsonism (hypokinetic–rigid syndrome); (2) to search systematically for ‘red flags’ (alarm signs that may signal the presence of AP); and (3) to integrate these two steps, as a basis for a narrow differential diagnosis and a guide for further ancillary tests.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Predictors of falls and fractures in bradykinetic rigid syndromes: a retrospective study
- Is it Parkinson’s disease, and if not, what is it?
- Visual hallucinations in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism
- The role of DAT-SPECT in movement disorders
- A 15-year population-based cohort study of the incidence of Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies in an elderly French cohort
- Time course of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension and urinary incontinence in patients with postmortem confirmed parkinsonian syndromes: a clinicopathological study
- Parkinson's disease: chameleons and mimics
- Changes in diagnosis with follow-up in an incident cohort of patients with parkinsonism
- Delayed blink reflex in dementia with Lewy bodies
- A panel of nine cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers may identify patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes