Article Text

Download PDFPDF
iPhone-responsive functional gait disorder
  1. Shona Scott,
  2. Jon Stone
  1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jon Stone, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; Jon.Stone{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


About 10% of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders (also called conversion disorders) are related primarily to problems with standing and walking.1–6 They should be diagnosed by demonstrating internal inconsistency and incongruity with disease, but this process can be especially problematic for gait disorders reflected in a higher rate of misdiagnosis than other functional disorders.7 We report two cases of a particular subtype of functional gait disorder, astasia, which were detected because of the effect that iPhone use had on the presenting symptoms. We review previous literature in this area.

Case 1

A 16-year-old boy presented with a 3-day history of balance problems. This began after he fell against a wall after a 1 h period of standing. He had three subsequent falls to the ground with no dizziness, vertigo, weakness or sensory disturbance. If he concentrated hard, or focused intently on something else such as his iPhone, his balance and gait were normal but, ‘If I relax with my mind blank, I fall over.’ He reported chronic insomnia, intermittent low mood and episodes of depersonalisation. He and his family were anxious about a sinister cause.

As he entered the room he was texting on his phone with a normal gait. Neurological examination on the bed was normal. When …

View Full Text


  • ▸ The supplementary video is published online only. To view please visit the journal online (

  • Contributors SS was responsible for drafting the case studies and the article. JS revised the article.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed. This paper was reviewed by Mark Edwards, London, UK.

Linked Articles

  • Editors' choice
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

Other content recommended for you