You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 17, Issue 2
  • Symptomatic intracranial hypertension during recovery from the syndrome of headache with neurologic deficits and cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytosis (HANDL)

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
A difficult case
Symptomatic intracranial hypertension during recovery from the syndrome of headache with neurologic deficits and cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytosis (HANDL)
  1. Eoin Mulroy1⇑,
  2. Joel Yap2,
  3. Helen Danesh-Meyer2,
  4. Neil Anderson1
  1. 1 Department of Neurology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
  2. 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to Dr Eoin Mulroy, Department of Neurology, Auckland Hospital, 2 Park Road, Auckland 1023, New Zealand; EoinM{at}adhb.govt.nz

Abstract

The syndrome of headache with neurologic deficits and cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytosis (HANDL) is rare; it comprises migrainous headaches (generally in headache-naïve people), fluctuating neurological symptoms and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lymphocytosis. The syndrome generally runs a benign, self-limiting course over weeks. A small proportion of patients develop intracranial hypertension as a consequence of the illness. Recurrence of headaches or development of visual symptoms following apparent recovery from HANDL should prompt urgent re-evaluation for elevated intracranial pressure. Short-to-medium term management with CSF drainage and acetazolamide may be necessary to prevent visual loss.

  • HEADACHE
  • VISION
  • MIGRAINE

https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2016-001539

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors EM was responsible for project concept and design, acquisition of data, manuscript preparation and critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content. JY critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content and was involved in supervision of the project. HDM critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content and was involved in supervision of the project. NA was involved in project concept and design, critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content and project supervision.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. This paper was reviewed by Alexandra Sinclair, Birmingham, UK, and Nicholas Davies, London, UK.

    Other content recommended for you