Article Text
PDFEditorial
Assessing neurology training in the UK
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests Both authors have served as chair of the Specialist Advisory Committee that supervised neurology training in the UK.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- How to do it
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Hepatology training in the UK
- What shape do UK trainees want their training to be? Results of a cross-sectional study
- Less than full-time as a new normal in paediatric training in the UK
- Securing a cardiology speciality training programme in the UK: how did other people do it?
- Legislative changes
- An evaluation of demographic factors affecting performance in a paediatric membership multiple-choice examination
- Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback
- Addressing recruitment and retention in paediatrics: a pipeline to a brighter future
- The association between mentoring and training outcomes in junior doctors in medicine: an observational study
- Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) performance of doctors who passed Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) tests compared with UK medical graduates: national data linkage study