Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Seasoned readers of Practical Neurology may recall Richard Davenport’s treatise on the practicalities of the clinic letter.1 One of the few negatives of the increasing move from paper to digital records is that it is no longer easy to read old letters, which sometimes go back many decades. Beyond the nostalgic sight of ‘carbon copies’ of classic typewriter print on wafer-thin paper, we are reminded of the dramatic changes in language and tone of the clinic letter. Copying correspondence to patients has been a major force in improving the quality of letters. Knowing that the patient will read the letter provides a strong incentive for accurate, clear and polite accounts of consultations.2
Yet, parts of contemporary …
Footnotes
Contributors All the authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests PEMS is co-editor of Practical Neurology.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed by Richard Davenport, Edinburgh, UK and Rhys Thomas, Newcastle, UK.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Enhancing relational care through expressions of gratitude: insights from a historical case study of almoner–patient correspondence
- Write a clinical letter
- Prospective assessment of patient directed outpatient communication from a patient and general practitioner perspective
- Before compassion: sympathy, tact and the history of the ideal nurse
- Write2me: using patient feedback to improve postconsultation urology clinic letters
- Referral patterns after a seizure admission in an English region: an opportunity for effective intervention? An observational study of routine hospital data
- Feasibility of real-time capture of routine clinical data in the electronic health record: a hospital-based, observational service-evaluation study
- Gender bias in reference letters for residency and academic medicine: a systematic review
- ‘Miscarriage or abortion?’ Understanding the medical language of pregnancy loss in Britain; a historical perspective
- Digital dictation and voice transcription software enhances outpatient clinic letter production: a crossover study