Article Text
PDFNeuromythology
Clinic letters revisited
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors All the authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests PEMS is co-editor of Practical Neurology.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed by Richard Davenport, Edinburgh, UK and Rhys Thomas, Newcastle, UK.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Enhancing relational care through expressions of gratitude: insights from a historical case study of almoner–patient correspondence
- Write a clinical letter
- Prospective assessment of patient directed outpatient communication from a patient and general practitioner perspective
- Before compassion: sympathy, tact and the history of the ideal nurse
- Write2me: using patient feedback to improve postconsultation urology clinic letters
- Referral patterns after a seizure admission in an English region: an opportunity for effective intervention? An observational study of routine hospital data
- Feasibility of real-time capture of routine clinical data in the electronic health record: a hospital-based, observational service-evaluation study
- Development and evaluation of a text analytics algorithm for automated application of national COVID-19 shielding criteria in rheumatology patients
- Gender bias in reference letters for residency and academic medicine: a systematic review
- ‘Miscarriage or abortion?’ Understanding the medical language of pregnancy loss in Britain; a historical perspective