Even as a modestly busy general neurologist with a special interest in stroke, I must confess to no recall of ever having seen a patient with a problem affecting the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm. I had probably last thought seriously about the nerve in 1964 when I took my anatomy exams, and I presumably had seen it during the tentative dissection of an upper limb with my student colleagues in 1962. I suppose I must have thought about it again in the early 1980s, at least for long enough to have a picture put in my Handbook of Neurology (Warlow 1991). But this nerve is so insignificant for the medical neurologist that it is not even indexed in ‘Bradley’ under lateral, cutaneous, nerve or forearm (Bradley et al. 2000). Maybe Americans have done away with the nerve altogether as they advance to a higher form of primate life.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Randomized trial of ultrasound-guided superior cluneal nerve block
- Dermatological clues to neurological diagnoses
- Post-stroke mutism
- Temporal changes in the documentation of neurological findings among patients with acute ischaemic stroke in a single centre in Japan: a retrospective cross-sectional study
- Elbow arthroscopy: state of the art
- Results of compartment decompression in chronic forearm compartment syndrome: six case presentations
- Predicting functional outcome in acute stroke: comparison of a simple six variable model with other predictive systems and informal clinical prediction
- Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke
- Neurology is psychiatry—and vice versa
- A study of bone densitometry in patients with complex regional pain syndrome after stroke