Article Text
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
This ‘How to do it’ series presents a paradox. The aim is simple–an expert advises a relative novice on the best approach to a particular problem, in this case the confirmation of a suspected diagnosis of myasthenia gravis. However, in reality the approaches of the expert and the novice are quite different. The expert subconsciously uses their enormous experience of the condition to make a gestalt diagnosis, and might then use one or two carefully chosen tests to provide laboratory confirmation, being familiar with the false-positive and false-negative implications of each test. The less experienced misinterprets the clinical picture, arranges inappropriate investigations, and is then caught out by false-positive findings. It is partly because of such considerations that patients increasingly demand access to specialist rather than general clinics. This paradox aside, the aim of this review is to offer some advice from the experienced to the less experienced,
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Update on myasthenia gravis
- Myasthenia gravis
- Epidemiology of seropositive myasthenia gravis in Greece
- Difference in distribution of muscle weakness between myasthenia gravis and the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome
- Myasthenia gravis and other neuromuscular junction disorders
- Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of dysphagia in myasthenia gravis
- Common toxidromes in movement disorder neurology
- CADDIE2—evaluation of a clinical decision-support system for early detection of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in paediatric intensive care: study protocol for a diagnostic study
- Persistent type 2 respiratory failure on background of advanced thymoma with lung metastases
- Mortality and survival in myasthenia gravis: a Danish population based study