Article Text
Abstract
The persistent vegetative state (PVS) was described in the Lancet exactly 30 years ago by Bryan Jennett, a neurosurgeon, and the neurologist Fred Plum (Jennett & Plum 1972). Jennett has recently reviewed the subject (Jennett 2002). Sometimes described as a condition of wakefulness without awareness, it can follow a range of severe insults to the brain. Often misdiagnosed, frequently misunderstood, the syndrome provides a useful shorthand for a diverse but distinctive set of clinical phenomena. Although it has withstood the scrutiny of ethicists and lawyers, it assumes a concept of awareness that may not stand the test of time. In this article I will sketch its key features and end by asking how confident we can really be that a patient in the PVS is wakeful, but conscious of nothing.
Many of us will remember our first encounter with a patient in the vegetative state (VS), as the condition is
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Thalamic proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vegetative state induced by traumatic brain injury
- The vegetative state − clinical diagnosis
- The persistent vegetative state, treatment withdrawal, and the Hillsborough disaster: Airedale NHS Trust v Bland
- ‘Is she alive? Is she dead?’ Representations of chronic disorders of consciousness in Douglas Coupland's Girlfriend in a Coma
- The vegetative state
- Partial recovery of vegetative state after a massive ischaemic stroke in a child with sickle cell anaemia
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Neurological disorders, affective bioethics, and the nervous system: reconsidering the Schiavo case from a materialist perspective
- A matter of life and death
- The vegetative state