Article Text
Abstract
I greatly enjoyed David Thrush’s observations on taking a good history (Practical Neurology, 2002, 2, 113–116). There are two other outpatient practices that I believe are valuable. After initial introductions I read the referral letter out loud, so the patient then knows what I know about them and can fill in any gaps. This gives an immediate focus to taking the history and avoids the patient having to sit and watch me reading. Although some referral letters are still written in such a way that the writer had probably not intended the patient to know the contents, these are increasingly uncommon and may be made suitable by anticipatory and judicious paraphrasing. The second practice is that I dictate my letter in front of the patient and, as now recommended in the National Health Service Modernization Plan, send a copy to the patient. This has many advantages; firstly, it ensures
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Improving best practice for patients receiving hospital discharge letters: a realist review
- Homeless people’s access to primary care physiotherapy services: an exploratory, mixed-method investigation using a follow-up qualitative extension to core quantitative research
- Chronic daily headache
- Fifth report on the provision of services for patients with heart disease
- Improving best practice for patients receiving hospital discharge letters: a realist review protocol
- Teaching in a busy clinic
- Write a clinical letter
- Feasibility of real-time capture of routine clinical data in the electronic health record: a hospital-based, observational service-evaluation study
- Qualitative investigation of patients’ experience of a glaucoma virtual clinic in a specialist ophthalmic hospital in London, UK
- Effect on hospital attendance rates of giving patients a copy of their referral letter: randomised controlled trial