Download PDFPDF
Cortical foot
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Response to letter to the editor dated 14th February 2021, from Drs Wimalaratna and Alagoda, regarding the article “Cortical Foot”.
    • Robin Fox, Dr Salford Royal NHS
    • Other Contributors:
      • Laszlo Sztriha, Dr

    Thank you for your interest in our case report.

    To address your first point, we did not carry out nerve conduction studies or electromyography. The patient was seen as a part of a hyperacute stroke service and we made the diagnosis within 48 hours of symptom onset. After finding an explanatory central lesion, we did not look further peripherally. It would seem to be highly unlikely the patient had developed a simultaneous acute stroke in a relevant area of cortex and peroneal nerve lesion. It is interesting you mention teaching medical students in your response - we teach our students about Occam's razor! As you will no doubt be aware, neurophysiology conducted this soon after symptom onset will be unlikely to contribute in any case, and we are not in the habit of recalling patients at a later date for additional investigations for purely academic value, and we are sure many would share our view this is not appropriate given the current pressure the NHS is under. A stroke diagnosis changes management in terms of secondary preventative medications, hypothetically diagnosing a co-existent compressive neuropathy does not add.

    Secondly, we would argue that the location of this lesion does explain the neurological signs quite satisfactorily. As we know, the ankle dorsiflexors are in fact located in the anterior compartment of the lower leg, just below the knee and not actually in the foot itself. Furthermore, there is likely to be considerable individual var...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Cortical foot
    • Sunil Wimalaratna, Neurologist Kettering General Hospital and OUH
    • Other Contributors:
      • Shyama Alagoda, Neurophysiologist

    Letter to the editor; 14th February 2021

    RE: Cortical foot

    Fox R,Sztriha L. Pract Neurol 2021, 21:73-74

    Dear Editors,

    We read the above article (like all highly educational articles of Practical Neurology) with interest.

    As the authors pointed out the clinical picture is highly suggestive of peroneal nerve lesion. There was no mention of NCS and EMG had been undertaken in this case. If NCS were carried out then it is prudent to stated that Nerve Conduction Studies excluded Common Peroneal nerve lesion, to make the case water tight and credible.

    It is known that elderly would wake up with foot drop due to Peroneal nerve lesion and not necessarily indicate a stroke. In this case an ischaemic lesion was noted at the top of the motor strip and not in the depth of central sulcus where the foot is located. As the homunculus illustrates in Figure 2, the lesion is at the Knee area at best). Parasagittal meningiomas in the depth cause the foot weakness(also suggesting that the well-known ‘homunculus illustration is probably accurate’!) and we teach medical students practical neuroanatomy and localization using such examples. Thus it would be helpful for the paper to document all claims as accurately as possible.

    Dr S Wimalaratna, Neurologist, Kettering General Hospital

    Dr S Alagoda, Clinical Neurophysiologist, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.

Other content recommended for you