In this article, we consider the arguments for and against physician-assisted suicide (AS) and physician-assisted euthanasia (Eu). We assess the evidence around law and practice in three jurisdictions where one or both are legal, with emphasis on data from Oregon. We compare the eligibility criteria in these different regions and review the range of approved disorders. Cancer is the most common cause for which requests are granted, with neurodegenerative diseases, mostly motor neurone disease, ranking second. We review the issues that may drive requests for a physician-assisted death, such as concerns around loss of autonomy and the possible role of depression. We also review the effectiveness and tolerability of some of the life-ending medications used. We highlight significant variation in regulatory oversight across the different models. A large amount of data are missing or unavailable. We explore physician-AS and physician-assisted Eu within the wider context of end-of-life practice.
- evidence-based neurology
- health policy & practice
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors UN drafted the manuscript and subsequent revisions and conceived and designed the review. CR sourced information and provided the figures. KAL provided advice relating to ethics and logical argumentation. All authors critically appraised and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version of the article.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests CR and ML are the members of the Association of Palliative Medicine. CR manages the KADOH website (www.kadoh.uk).
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally reviewed by Martin Turner, Oxford, UK.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide
- Legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon and The Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in vulnerable groups—another perspective on Oregon's data
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study
- Death - whose decision? Euthanasia and the terminally ill
- Physician-assisted death with limited access to palliative care
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada