MRI is a staple of the neurologist’s armoury when facing diagnostic challenges. At times, it can reveal or confirm the diagnosis with clarity, at others it brings us no further forwards, or even muddies the water. We rely on the expertise of neuroradiology colleagues to interpret MR images, but the choice of protocol for MR acquisition and its interpretation hinge crucially on the clinical information we provide. Having a degree of understanding about how MRI works, its limitations and pitfalls, can help to optimise what we learn from a scan.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors CLM wrote and revised the paper. SE and ET revised the paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned. Externally peer reviewed by Fergus Rugg-Gunn, London, UK.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Clinician’s guide to the basic principles of MRI
- A review of structural magnetic resonance neuroimaging
- CSF β-amyloid and white matter damage: a new perspective on Alzheimer’s disease
- Cortical abnormalities on MRI: what a neurologist should know
- Understanding MRI: basic MR physics for physicians
- Breaking with a dogma: persisting diffusion restrictions (pDWI) in follow-up after endovascular treatment for stroke
- Imaging in children presenting with acute neurological deficit: stroke
- Imaging in acute ischaemic stroke: essential for modern stroke care
- An MRI review of acquired corpus callosum lesions
- Persistent lesion hyperintensity on brain diffusion-weighted MRI is an early sign of intravascular lymphoma