Article info
Review
Depression after stroke
- Correspondence to Professor João Facucho-Oliveira, Department of Mental Health and Psychiatry, Lusiadas Health Group, Lisboa, Portugal; Jmfacuchoo{at}hotmail.com
Citation
Depression after stroke
Publication history
- Accepted April 15, 2021
- First published May 14, 2021.
Online issue publication
September 17, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 May 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Co-occurrence of depressive symptoms and executive dysfunction after stroke: associations with brain pathology and prognosis
- Prevention of poststroke depression: 1 year randomised placebo controlled double blind trial of mianserin with 6 month follow up after therapy
- Stroke depression: a concept with clinical applicability
- Common susceptibility variants of KDR and IGF-1R are associated with poststroke depression in the Chinese population
- Relation between depression after stroke, antidepressant therapy, and functional recovery
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressant treatment in poststroke depression: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis
- Integrative-interpersonal dynamic therapy for poststroke depression (INID): study protocol of a randomised controlled pilot trial
- A comparative study into the one year cumulative incidence of depression after stroke and myocardial infarction
- Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of post-stroke depression: results from a randomised, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial
- Screening for poststroke major depression: a meta-analysis of diagnostic validity studies