Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Dementia, the most feared accompaniment of ageing, already affects more than 900 000 people in the UK, with numbers predicted to rise rapidly in line with increasing life expectancy.1 As the scale of the coming epidemic with its attendant financial implications becomes clear, dementia prevention becomes ever more a priority for governments, and individuals increasingly want to know what they can do to modify their risk.
Evidence linking a variety of potential risk factors for dementia comes predominantly from observational and epidemiological studies alongside some clinical trials, which have been synthesised in several comprehensive analyses, the best known of which is the Lancet Commission on Dementia. First published in 20172 and revised in 2020,3 this identifies 12 potentially modifiable risk factors acting at different stages of life that together might explain ~40% of worldwide dementia risk. In early life, the principle risk is low education. In mid-life (defined as ages 45–65 years) these are obesity, excess alcohol, traumatic brain injury, hearing loss and hypertension; while in later life smoking, depression, social isolation, physical inactivity, diabetes mellitus and air pollution are implicated.
That such a significant proportion of dementia cases might be modifiable is cause for optimism at a time when therapeutic advances in dementia are few and far between. However, several important questions remain. What evidence is there to guide specific targets and interventions? How much modification can reasonably be expected in practice? What aspects of dementia are we preventing? And are there more risk factors to be determined?
When it comes to making recommendations, there is a relative lack of randomised controlled trial evidence to …
Footnotes
Twitter @jmschott
Contributors JMS is the sole author of this paper.
Funding The author acknowledges the support of the UCL/H NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.
Competing interests JMS is Chief Medical Officer for Alzheimer’s Research UK and Clinical Advisor to the UK Dementia Research Institute.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned. Externally peer reviewed by Rhys Davies, Liverpool, UK.
Linked Articles
- Highlights from this issue
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Association between dementia parental family history and mid-life modifiable risk factors for dementia: a cross-sectional study using propensity score matching within the Lifelines cohort
- Examining the Lancet Commission risk factors for dementia using Mendelian randomisation
- A novel, multidomain, primary care nurse-led and mHealth-assisted intervention for dementia risk reduction in middle-aged adults (HAPPI MIND): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
- Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Designing prevention programmes to reduce incidence of dementia: prospective cohort study of modifiable risk factors
- HEalth And Dementia outcomes following Traumatic Brain Injury (HEAD-TBI): protocol for a retrospective cohort study
- Uptake and effectiveness of a tailor-made online lifestyle programme targeting modifiable risk factors for dementia among middle-aged descendants of people with recently diagnosed dementia: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial (Demin study)
- Population based study on patients with traumatic brain injury suggests increased risk of dementia
- Cognitive stimulation in the workplace, plasma proteins, and risk of dementia: three analyses of population cohort studies
- Dementia prevention: the Mendelian randomisation perspective