Article Text
Review
Pragmatic guide to peripheral nerve disease and the role of clinical biomarkers
Abstract
In clinical neurology practice, there are few sensitive, specific and responsive serological biomarkers reflecting pathological processes affecting the peripheral nervous system. Instead, we rely on surrogate multimodality biomarkers for diagnosis and management. Correct use and interpretation of the available tests is essential to ensure that appropriate treatments are used and adjusted in a timely fashion. The incorrect application or interpretation of biomarkers can result in misdiagnosis and delays in appropriate treatment. Here, we discuss the uses and limitations of such biomarkers and discuss possible future developments.
- NEUROPATHY
- CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
- NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
- NEURORADIOLOGY
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Highlights from this issue
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ultrasensitive assay technology and fluid biomarkers for the evaluation of peripheral nerve disease
- Untangling a case of painful neuropathy
- Diagnosis and treatment in inflammatory neuropathies
- CSF sphingomyelin: a new biomarker of demyelination in the diagnosis and management of CIDP and GBS
- Peripheral nerve diseases
- CIDP: mimics and chameleons
- POEMS neuropathy: optimising diagnosis and management
- Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from pathology to phenotype
- Oligoclonal IgG bands in chronic inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies
- Ultrasound in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy: structure meets function in the neuromuscular clinic