Article Text
Abstract
The introduction of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies represents a step forward in preventive migraine treatment as the first agents to target the underlying pathogenesis of migraine. In trials they act more quickly, have better long-term adherence and appear to be better tolerated than other treatments. Major disadvantages are their high cost and unknown safety in pregnancy and in cardiovascular disease. To mitigate these concerns, they should be used according to guidance produced by professional bodies, with defined starting and stopping criteria. We do not yet know whether they are more effective than standard care; many patients may still be better treated by other means, in particular addressing lifestyle factors and medication-overuse headache.
- HEADACHE
- MIGRAINE
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors NJG was commissioned and wrote the article.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests The author received hospitality from Teva (fremanezumab) in 2019 and from Allergan (Botox) in 2018 (conference, hotel and flights). The author has never received honoraria from the CGRP monoclonal antibodies manufacturers, has no financial interests in them, and has not been involved in trials of these products.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed by Stuart Weatherby, Plymouth, UK and Richard Stark, Melbourne, Australia.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Three new drugs for the prevention of migraine
- Switching of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide in chronic migraine in clinical practice: a case series
- Management of chronic migraine
- Calcitonin gene related peptide in migraine: current therapeutics, future implications and potential off-target effects
- Effect of erenumab on functional outcomes in patients with episodic migraine in whom 2–4 preventives were not useful: results from the LIBERTY study
- Chronic migraine
- Two-year efficacy and safety of erenumab in participants with episodic migraine and 2–4 prior preventive treatment failures: results from the LIBERTY study
- 4CPS-354 Efficacy and safety with erenumab and galcanezumab: our experience
- CGRP-mediated trigeminovascular reactivity in migraine patients treated with erenumab
- Photophobia: shared pathophysiology underlying dry eye disease, migraine and traumatic brain injury leading to central neuroplasticity of the trigeminothalamic pathway