Article Text
Highlights from this issue
Editors’ commentary
Statistics from Altmetric.com
It is said that a successful quiz question, whether in a departmental quiz or hit TV show, is where the answer prompts one of two responses, either ‘Yup, I knew that’ or ‘Gosh, I didn’t know that’. Papers in Practical Neurology aim to elicit somewhat similar reactions, though sometimes they also try to change the way we think about something that we already know.
Spontaneous intracranial hypotension, although first described in the 1930s, has become much more widely recognised because of its MRI findings, and its well-characterised clinical syndrome is now familiar to all neurologists. Many patients recover well when the condition is recognised and treated with an epidural blood patch. However, many do not. Manjit Matharu and …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Procedural predictors of epidural blood patch efficacy in spontaneous intracranial hypotension
- Spontaneous intracranial hypotension presenting with progressive cognitive decline
- A two-level large-volume epidural blood patch protocol for spontaneous intracranial hypotension: retrospective analysis of risk and benefit
- Patient experience of diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a cross-sectional online survey
- Epidural blood patching in an anticoagulated patient with intracranial hypotension
- Epidural blood patch is an iatrogenic epidural hematoma: asymptomatic or symptomatic? This is the question
- Postural headache
- Multidisciplinary consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension
- Survey of healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding spontaneous intracranial hypotension
- Successful management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension with epidural blood patch