Article Text
Abstract
For educated and intellectually curious adults who are without specialist or scientific training, it would be difficult for neurologists to exaggerate the value of articles in medical journals. I hear repeatedly from patients – and their families – with various neurological problems how helpful it is to read the medical literature. On the other hand, it would be easy for neurologists to misinterpret their motivation. It is incorrect to think that the patient’s search represents a single-minded inquiry just for more scientific knowledge – the facts – explaining the biological basis of a neurological disorder, and its treatment. To be sure, this information is no less important for patients than for their doctors, but the patient’s quest is also for a greater understanding of the meaning of illness and its impact on their quality of life. It is therefore essential that even primarily ‘medical’ journals encompass the broad scope of difficulties encountered by patients
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Spinal muscular atrophy–type I
- The wish to die and hastening death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A scoping review
- Pushing the profession: how the news media turned patient safety into a priority
- Survey of quality and clarity of methods and results reporting in 1 year of intervention studies published in high-impact medical and psychiatric journals
- Malingering and factitious disorder
- Hidden in plain sight: the covering of patients’ eyes and a microethics of medical photography
- The “four quadrants” approach to clinical ethics case analysis; an application and review
- Subtle neuropsychiatric symptoms of glioblastoma multiforme misdiagnosed as depression
- Towards cultural materialism in the medical humanities: the case of blood rejuvenation
- Facial self-mutilation: an analysis of published cases