Article Text
Abstract
Epidemiology is based on a very simple principle: diseases do not occur at random, but in patterns that reflect their causes. The corollary is that by studying patterns of disease, it is possible to identify the causes of those diseases. And for many types of disease the application of this principle has been outstandingly successful. As Stolley and Lasky pointed out in their excellent and readable book, Investigating Disease Patterns (Stolley & Laskey 1998), it is not an exaggeration to say that much of what we know about the causes of cancer, of infectious disease and of chronic conditions such as coronary heart disease is derived from epidemiological studies. Epidemiology has also identified many environmental influences that cause illness. The dangers of cigarette smoking, exposure to mineral dusts, ionizing radiation, lead and a host of other substances present in the environment have been discovered and quantified largely through epidemiological investigations.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Identifying occupational carcinogens: an update from the IARC Monographs
- ‘Lung cancer and tobacco consumption’: technical evaluation of the 1943 paper by Schairer and Schoeniger published in Nazi Germany
- PUMA – pooled uranium miners analysis: cohort profile
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to occupational exposure to silica dust: a review of epidemiological and pathological evidence
- Biological dust exposure in the workplace is a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Occupation and risk of stomach cancer in Poland
- Tobacco manufacturers’ defence against plaintiffs’ claims of cancer causation: throwing mud at the wall and hoping some of it will stick
- Respiratory disease and cardiovascular morbidity
- Occupational exposures and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): comparison of a COPD-specific job exposure matrix and expert-evaluated occupational exposures
- Lung cancer and dust exposure: results of a prospective cohort study following 3260 workers for 50 years