Article Text
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Many patients present to neurology outpatient clinics without serious pathology–the classic example is the patient with chronic headache who believes he has a brain tumour. After a history and examination the neurologist is confident of the diagnosis of chronic tension-type headache, but is left not knowing whether to send the patient for a brain scan ‘for reassurance’. Do investigations reassure patients, or do they make them suspect that the doctor is uncertain of the diagnosis, so leading to increased anxiety about an underlying disease?
THE EVIDENCE BASE
The literature is conflicting (Howard & Wessely 1996). It is difficult to measure reassurance (there are no specific tests for it!). Asking the patient whether he or she feels reassured is problematic because most patients want to please their doctors. In addition to asking specific questions about the patient’s feelings of reassurance, researchers have therefore resorted to measuring reassurance by using
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Serious neurological disorders in children with chronic headache
- Usual care and a self-management support programme versus usual care and a relaxation programme for people living with chronic headache disorders: a randomised controlled trial protocol (CHESS)
- The lived experience of chronic headache: a systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature
- Headache
- Fifteen minute consultation: an approach to the child with chronic headaches
- Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as adjunctive treatment for chronic headache in adults with clinically stable systemic lupus erythematosus (SHADE): a randomised double-blind multiarm sham controlled clinical trial
- Chronic daily headache
- Management of children and young people with headache
- Chronic migraine headache and multiple dental pathologies causing cranial pain for 35 years: the neurodental nexus
- Tension-type headache