Article Text
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Fitness to fly is not defined merely by the absence of disease. The standards for aircrew are such that even without significant disease an individual may not be considered fit to fly, for example if there is significant myopia. In contrast, even documented conditions, such as coronary artery disease, may not preclude fitness to fly in certain circumstances. The medical standards are set with the aim of maintaining flight safety at an acceptable level.
WHAT IS AN ACCEPTABLE RISK?
A zero risk environment is unattainable. In aviation therefore the concept of ‘acceptable risk’ has been developed (Tunstall-Pedoe 1984). This approach uses an overall fatal accident rate which is reasonably achievable (one in 10 million flights). To simplify the calculations which follow, each flight is deemed to last 1 hour, though most commercial flights are much longer. It is further postulated that no one component (crew failure, airworthiness, mechanical failure
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Managing passengers with stable respiratory disease planning air travel: British Thoracic Society recommendations
- Clearing the airways: advocacy and regulation for smoke-free airlines
- Fitness to fly for passengers with cardiovascular disease
- Effect of simulated commercial flight on oxygenation in patients with interstitial lung disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Cardiovascular disease and airline travel
- Accidents and injuries related to powered paragliding: a cross-sectional study
- Air travel in women with lymphangioleiomyomatosis
- Stephen Anthony Cullen
- Flying after heart surgery
- The safety of aeroplane travel in patients with symptomatic carotid occlusion