Article Text
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Quality measurement and improvement have an image problem. It just isn’t sexy. This is not to say that clinicians aren’t interested in providing excellent care, quite the reverse. Nonetheless, compared with treating patients or research, reflecting on daily practice can seem rather mundane. The lack of time and resources traditionally devoted to the topic, together with a recent emphasis on publishing performance ‘league tables’, have also hampered our proper engagement. In truth, an element of complacency has also held us back. Audit and quality improvement are often regarded as a chore, a box to be ticked or a task to be delegated to junior staff. Inevitably, the fruits of these labours are often superficial, irrelevant, disconnected or even threatening, and contribute to the disenchantment.
Most hospitals still lack effective systems for monitoring and improving the quality of their clinical services. However, this state of affairs must, and is, coming
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Hospital managers’ perspectives with implementing quality improvement measures and a new regulatory framework: a qualitative case study
- Qualitative study of international key informants’ perspectives on the current and future state of healthcare quality measurement and feedback
- How do contextual factors influence quality and safety work in the Norwegian home care and nursing home settings? A qualitative study about managers’ experiences
- Quality improvement education to improve performance on ulcerative colitis quality measures and care processes aligned with National Quality Strategy priorities
- Process evaluation of a tailored multifaceted feedback program to improve the quality of intensive care by using quality indicators
- Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP)
- Exploring managers’ response to a quality and safety leadership intervention: findings from a multiple case study in Norwegian nursing homes and homecare services
- Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care
- Refocusing quality measurement to best support quality improvement: local ownership of quality measurement by clinicians
- The American Heart Association’s Get With the Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke development and impact on stroke care