Article Text
PDF
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Innovations obviously create new opportunities. However, they also lead to uncertainties in comparison with the status quo ante. Since its conceptualization began in the 1960s, brain death has been viewed controversially in many cultural settings (Pernick 1999; Schneider 1999; Schöne-Seifert 1999; Schlich 2001), particularly in relation to organ transplantation (Wiesemann 2001; Lindemann 2002; Lock 2002; Manzei 2002). Historical citations have been used by both the proponents and opponents of the concept of brain death, often enough without knowledge of the (con)text, in order to underpin their arguments and/or to discredit those of their adversaries. The most current ones are that brain death was already around in 1800 or, conversely, that it was invented after 1968 to increase the harvest of organs for transplantation (Schlich 1999).
This article summarizes my research, along with that of Bellanger and Steinbrecher, on the development of the debate in Switzerland. It is based on
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Do the ‘brain dead’ merely appear to be alive?
- A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy
- On the ethical permissibility of in situ reperfusion in cardiac transplantation after the declaration of circulatory death
- Brain death revisited: it is not ‘complete death’ according to Islamic sources
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- Is there a place for CPR and sustained physiological support in brain-dead non-donors?
- Death and organ donation: back to the future
- Death and legal fictions
- Heart surgery and transplantation: innovations impacting on concepts of life and death
- Does it matter that organ donors are not dead? Ethical and policy implications