Article Text
Abstract
Ten years ago, when I was a medical student, my father developed a neurological problem. He went for his regular eye test, but also had his visual fields checked on the new Humphrey Field Analyser recently bought by the optometrists. Trouble followed. The test was repeated in greater detail, and he appeared to have a bitemporal superior quadrantanopia (Fig. 1a). He was referred to his general practitioner who referred him on to the local neurology department for further investigation. More trouble followed as my parents telephoned me (the only faintly medical person in the family) to ask for the potential causes, tests, treatments, operations and outlook.
My father was completely well, and had noticed no visual problem. My differential diagnosis then only consisted of one possibility – a pituitary tumour pressing on the optic chiasm. It had taken most of my second year at medical school to come to grips with
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Eyes and stroke: the visual aspects of cerebrovascular disease
- Assess and interpret the visual fields at the bedside
- Giant prolactinoma mimicking low-tension glaucoma at presentation
- Visual prognostic value of the pattern electroretinogram in chiasmal compression
- Uncontrolled diabetes as a rare presenting cause of pituitary apoplexy
- Neurology of the pituitary gland
- Pituitary adenomas
- Predictive value of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness for postoperative visual improvement in patients with pituitary macroadenoma
- Pituitary hyperplasia with Sertoli cell-only and 47,XYY syndromes: an uncommon triad
- Diagnosis and management of prolactinomas and non-functioning pituitary adenomas