Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
“Reform, reform, reform. Aren’t things bad enough already?”
Duke of Wellington
Postgraduate medical training in the UK is changing, not through evolution but by revolution. There are three inter-related elements to these changes (box), with changes in the body supervising training (PMETB), the structure of training itself (MMC) and the method of application for training posts (MTAS). The recent marked failings in the last of these, both inherent in the selection tools and in the technology delivering it, have been widely discussed in the press.1 MTAS is now being reviewed and revised in an attempt to salvage credible and fair selection for training posts. However, the most dramatic long-term changes are in the introduction of run-through training and it is this that I will focus on here.
Changes in medical training in the UK
New supervisory body, the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board (PMETB) set up to oversee training; new standards for curricula and assessment methods; new approach to inspecting and approving training posts; and new methods for issuing specialist accreditation.
New training structure; Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) is a government body introducing run-through training for all specialties.
New selection method; Medical Training Application System (MTAS) is a new computer-based and national application system.
RUN-THROUGH TRAINING
Run-through training refers to a single training grade that takes the trainee from the end of their foundation programme, equivalent to intern elsewhere, through to specialist accreditation. Many readers from outside the UK will immediately be thinking “so what?”, because their system may already have run-through training. However, for UK trainees this is a dramatic change—more so for neurology than other specialties. The changes are meant to alter the structure but not the content of training.
The changes are illustrated in the figure. Previously, the first year after qualification was as a “houseman”, followed by 2–4 years in Senior House …
Footnotes
Competing interests: GF was Chairman of the Specialty Advisory Committee for Neurology during this period and had discussions with, and made submissions to, both the MMC and PMETB.
Linked Articles
- Editor’s choice
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- What’s happening in postgraduate medical education?
- Ophthalmic surgical training following modernising medical careers: regional variation in experience across the UK
- The role of the postgraduate medical education and training board
- Has Modernising Medical Careers lost its way?
- The association between mentoring and training outcomes in junior doctors in medicine: an observational study
- Current dilemmas in overseas doctors’ training
- Work based assessments are part of the solution (but only a part), not part of the problem
- Legislative changes
- Global health competencies in UK postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis
- MTAS—where are we now?